Carbon dating seal woman dating man 7 years younger
Living snails that carbon-date to 2,300 years old, a living seal that was carbon-dated at 1,300 years old, and 8,000-year-old living penguins.
Not to mention dinosaur bones that dated to 20,000 years ago.
Many of the quotes brought up by Comfort's sources do not address the theory of evolution in the slightest.
For example, several of Comfort's sources address the religiosity of Albert Einstein or try to prove the historicity or credibility of the Bible.
Now, new applications for the technique are emerging in forensics, thanks to research funded by NIJ and other organizations.
In recent years, forensic scientists have started to apply carbon-14 dating to cases in which law enforcement agencies hope to find out the age of a skeleton or other unidentified human remains.
In contrast, from 1955 to 1963, atmospheric radiocarbon levels almost doubled.
Since then they have been dropping back toward natural levels.
This article will provide a side-by-side commentary and critical analysis of this book, along with highlights of certain fallacies throughout the book.
Whenever the worldview of evolution is questioned, the topic of carbon dating always comes up.
However, as we will determine, all radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. Assumptions based on the belief that the future will be like the past.
The arguments presented by these sources (even if they were correct) do not have any relevance whatsoever to cellular biology or the theory of evolution.
It must be noted that Comfort, and several of his sources, deliberately and maliciously confuse the theory of evolution with abiogenesis and cosmology, the fields that address the origin of life and/or the origin of the universe.